Cases 41 - 50 of 108,944
Henderson v. Biden
as 3:2024cv01124
Plaintiff:
Tisha Henderson
Defendant:
Mr Joseph Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hamdan v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 3:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Karawan Hamdan
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Monzon v. Westin Operator, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01119
Plaintiff:
Jose T. Monzon
Defendant:
Westin Operator, LLC and Marriott International Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Malone v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01125
Plaintiff:
Amesha Malone
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Webster et al v. Opco LLC
as 4:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Rachel Webster, Skylor Dobbs and C.D.
Defendant:
Blue Box Opco LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Loetzerich et al v. Team ProMark, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Derek Loetzerich and Pulyston Auto Parts, Ltd
Defendant:
Team ProMark, LLC, Robert Taylor, Taylor Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Mills et al
as 4:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
John D. White
Defendant:
Dee Ann Mills and Danielle Parsons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sanchez-Gonzalez v. USA
as 3:2024cv01121
Petitioner:
Fernando Sanchez-Gonzalez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
