Cases 11 - 20 of 4,232
A.S. v. Mapleton Local School District et al.
as 1:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Mapleton Local School District, Mapleton Local School District Board of Education, Scott Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shabazz v. King
as 1:2024cv00488
Defendant:
Mayor Brandon King
Plaintiff:
Lateek Shabazz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Shank v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00745
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Shank
Defendant:
Shelby W. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Delfino et al. v. Summit County, Ohio
as 5:2024cv00743
Plaintiff:
Daniel Delfino, Mindy E. Delfino and State of Ohio
Defendant:
Summit County, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Filing Error
as 5:2024cv00739
Defendant:
City of Canton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jackson v. City of Canton et al.
as 5:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Destinee N. Jackson
Defendant:
City of Canton, Lieutenant Lester Marino, Sergeant Bryan McWilliams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Treasurer of Cuyahoga County, Ohio v. Barksdale
as 1:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Treasurer of Cuyahoga County, Ohio
Defendant:
Christopher Scott Barksdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Douglas v. Bates
as 3:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
Markeith Douglas
Defendant:
Esq. Julia R. Bates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Good Neighbor Alliance, Inc. v. Bassett Land Development Co., LLC et al.
as 3:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
Good Neighbor Alliance, Inc.
Defendant:
Bassett Land Development Co., LLC and Portage Township
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Specht v. City of Eastlake et al.
as 1:2024cv00684
Plaintiff:
James Michael Specht
Defendant:
City of Eastlake and Chirag Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
