Civil Rights Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 70,773
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00554
Plaintiff: Joe Doe
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00546
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act
Sabo Jr v. Honeycutt
as 2:2024cv10491
Plaintiff: George Frank Sabo Jr
Defendant: Deputy Brad Honeycutt and Brad Honeycutt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff: Leo Lamont Jones
Defendant: Rutherford County and James Elliot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bishop v. State of Michigan-Unemployment Insurance Agency
as 2:2024cv10588
Plaintiff: Shameka Jamice Bishop
Defendant: State of Michigan-Unemployment Insurance Agency
Bennett et al v. Berrien, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00234
Plaintiff: Faith Bennett, Denise Grooms, John Moore and others
Defendant: Bret Witkowski, Treasurer Shelly Weich, Treasurer Berrien County, Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1187
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Baugh v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv11174
Plaintiff: Jimmie Baugh
Defendant: Joann Miller and The City of Detroit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Baugh v. The City of Detroit et al
as 2:2024cv11175
Plaintiff: Jimmie Baugh
Defendant: The City of Detroit, joann Miller and Wayne County Prosecutors Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Baugh v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2024cv11177
Plaintiff: Jimmie Baugh
Defendant: Detroit, City of, Wayne County Prosecutors Office and Joann Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?