Cases 1 - 10 of 80,785
Quandel Construction Group, Inc. v. Hunt Construction Group, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02362
Plaintiff:
Quandel Construction Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Hunt Construction Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Resendez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02335
Plaintiff:
Angelo Resendez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tysinger et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02355
Plaintiff:
Lawrence K. Tysinger and Michele Tysinger
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peterson v. Workhorse Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Helen Peterson
Defendant:
Workhorse Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Pistole v. Pistole et al
as 1:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Dennis Pistole
Defendant:
Bethany Pistole and Auto-Owners Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
McKenzie
as 1:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
LeRone McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Olig et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02329
Plaintiff:
Candace R. Olig and James Olig
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Runkle v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02344
Plaintiff:
Donald Runkle
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burks v. Licking County Child Support Enforcement Agency
as 2:2024cv02330
Defendant:
Licking County Child Support Enforcement Agency and CSEA
Plaintiff:
Jordan Burks
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
