Cases 31 - 40 of 78,369
Lovepop, Inc. v. Paper Love LLC
as 1:2024cv03227
Plaintiff:
Lovepop, Inc.
Defendant:
Paper Love LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
SiOnyx, LLC v. Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd. et al
as 2:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
SiOnyx, LLC
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Telsync Technologies LLC v. Accenture PLC
as 2:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Telsync Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Accenture PLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
J&H Web Technologies, LLC v. Superhuman Labs, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
J&H Web Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Superhuman Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
JFXD TRX ACQ LLC v. East River JW Inc
as 2:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
JFXD TRX ACQ LLC a Florida limited liability company doing business as TRX
Defendant:
East River JW Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Definitive Holdings v. Powerteq
as 24-4048
Plaintiff:
DEFINITIVE HOLDINGS, LLC, a Utah limited liability company
Defendant:
POWERTEQ LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Sensormatic Electronics, LLC v. Genetec (USA) Inc.
as 24-1752
Plaintiff:
SENSORMATIC ELECTRONICS, LLC
Defendant:
GENETEC (USA) INC. and GENETEC, INC.
Vitaworks IP, LLC v. Glanbia Nutritionals (NA), Inc.
as 24-1532
Plaintiff:
VITAWORKS IP, LLC and VITAWORKS, LLC
Defendant:
GLANBIA NUTRITIONALS (NA), INC., PRINOVA US LLC and QIANJIANG YONGAN PHARMACEUTICAL CO. LTD.
Dyson Technology Limited v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01749
Plaintiff:
Dyson Technology Limited
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Cutesliving Store, Danlin Store and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
