Cases 1 - 10 of 7,659
GEICO a/s/o Raquel Vizcainobarroso v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2024cv05929
Plaintiff:
GEICO a/s/o Raquel Vizcainobarroso
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and Carlos Mazza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
BROWN v. BMW OF RAMSEY
as 2:2024cv05893
Plaintiff:
CLEVELAND H.V. BROWN
Defendant:
BMW OF RAMSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
CROTEAU v. FINANCIAL BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 2:2024cv01946
Plaintiff:
ALISON CROTEAU
Defendant:
FINANCIAL BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
INGRAO et al v. ADDSHOPPERS, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01022
Plaintiff:
AMELIA INGRAO and ELISABETH PACANA
Defendant:
ADDSHOPPERS, INC., NUTRISYSTEM, INC. and VIVINT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
PITT-OHIO EXPRESS, LLC et al v. ENGINEERED COATING SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
PITT-OHIO EXPRESS, LLC, DOHRN TRANSFER COMPANY, LLC and US CARGO INC.
Defendant:
ENGINEERED COATING SERVICES, LLC doing business as A2G WHEEL COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
REICHBART v. FINANCIAL BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 2:2024cv01876
Plaintiff:
MARC REICHBART
Defendant:
FINANCIAL BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SOLUTIONS, INC.
LIVINGSTON v. UBER et al
as 2:2024cv05839
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY TALMADGE LIVINGSTON
Defendant:
UBER and LYFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MATTHEWS v. SALDUTTI LAW GROUP LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01662
Plaintiff:
SAMEERAH M. MATTHEWS
Defendant:
SALDUTTI LAW GROUP LLC and ROBERT L. SALDUTTI ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
PIERCE et al v. KLOVER HOLDINGS, INC.
as 2:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
NATALIE PIERCE and MICHELLE INGRODI
Defendant:
KLOVER HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
