Cases 71 - 80 of 7,652
USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. TAF AUTOMOTIVE, INC.
as 2:2024cv01210
Plaintiff:
USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
TAF AUTOMOTIVE, INC. doing business as Ragtops & Roadsters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
LUXE DENTAL SPA LLC v. CHANGE HEALTHCARE INC. et al
as 2:2024cv04044
Plaintiff:
LUXE DENTAL SPA LLC
Defendant:
CHANGE HEALTHCARE INC., UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED, UNITED HEALTHCARE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
ZAIRE v. ALPER et al
as 2:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
NAQUEEN UNIQUE ZAIRE
Defendant:
JUDGE JODI LEE ALPER, MICHELLE SMITH doing business as CLERK OF COURT, ANTONIO BONANNI doing business as ATTORNEY OF HOK LAW GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DIGITAL DATA DEVICES, INC. v. DAVID
as 2:2024cv04010
Plaintiff:
DIGITAL DATA DEVICES, INC.
Defendant:
RAANA DAVID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
v. RAANAN
as 2:2024cv04011
Defendant:
DAVID RAANAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
DIGITAL DATA DEVICES, INC. v. RAANAN
as 2:2024cv04012
Plaintiff:
DIGITAL DATA DEVICES, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID RAANAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Dalicier v. Shively Motors
as 1:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Wilberson Severe Dalicer
Defendant:
Shively Motors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dalicier v. Churchill Mortgage
as 1:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Wilberson Severe Dalicier
Defendant:
Churchill Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Vincent Sorace, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
as 24-1498
Plaintiff:
VINCENT SORACE, JOSEPH YERTY, TAMMY YERTY and others
Petitioner:
SHAWN DAVID HUMMEL
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK NA
COHEN v. SEGAL & COMPANY, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01163
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MICHAEL COHEN
Defendant:
SEGAL & COMPANY, LLC and STEVEN A. SEGAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
