Cases 11 - 20 of 65,047
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Shull v. Harrell
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shull
Defendant:
Scott Harrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Chilton v. Texas Southern University
as 4:2024cv01646
Plaintiff:
Byron K. Chilton, Jr.
Defendant:
Texas Southern University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Murray et al v. Leblanc et al
as 3:2024mc00070
Plaintiff:
James Murray
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc
Petitioner:
Correct Commissary, LLC
Adams v. Bailey et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Adams
Defendant:
Sheriff Bryan Bailey, K-9 Officer Tony Shack, Investigator Christian Dedmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Dixon v. The Texas Department of Public Safety et al
as 4:2024cv01624
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Dixon
Defendant:
The Texas Department of Public Safety, Homeland Security Investigations, Air Force Office of Special Investigations and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
