Cases 31 - 40 of 42,809
Hurt v. J. Monts et al
as 8:2024cv02975
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mason Hurt
Defendant:
J. Monts and Detective Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Goings v. Neekson et al
as 1:2024cv01396
Plaintiff:
Mark Cassidy Goings
Defendant:
Neekson, Figuroa and Gavigin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services
as 1:2024cv01397
Plaintiff:
Colonel Preston Long, III
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Greer Police Department
as 6:2024cv03011
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
Greer Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Robinson v. Scott
as 6:2024cv03012
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lynn Robinson and Joshua HayMaker
Defendant:
Brittany D Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Passero v. Yes Care
as 1:2024cv00789
Plaintiff:
Steven Gregory Passero
Defendant:
Yes Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Murdock v. Ingram et al
as 3:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Ajanaku Murdock
Defendant:
Kevin Ingram, FNU Williams and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haleem v. Abello et al
as 1:2024cv01400
Plaintiff:
Samir Haleem
Defendant:
Frederick Abello and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnette v. Eady-Williams et al
as 5:2024ct03113
Plaintiff:
Anuneakas Arsintchez Barnette
Defendant:
Karen Eady-Williams, Susan Surles, Garry McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hovis v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Oreon Tyshon Hovis
Defendant:
Wayne Wilson, FNU Moore, County of Rutherford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
