Cases 21 - 30 of 4,825
Dugan v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
Jeremy Dugan
Respondent:
United States of America and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lindsey v. Cutright
as 1:2024cv00205
Petitioner:
Shaun Lindsey
Respondent:
C. Cutright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Aguon v. Hazelton F.C.I. Warden et al
as 5:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
Robert L. Aguon
Respondent:
Hazelton F.C.I. Warden, S.I.S. and The O.I.G.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dawson v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00027
Petitioner:
Javon Dawson
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Barker v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Eric Barker
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons and Anthony Mori
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Martinez-Turcio v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00193
Petitioner:
Javier Alex Martinez-Turcio
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Forbes v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00194
Petitioner:
Dennis A. Forbes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Reed v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00195
Petitioner:
Corey Stephon Reed
Respondent:
W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. Brown
as 5:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Roger Lee Smith
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rowell v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00188
Petitioner:
Jerry Rowell, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
