Cases 91 - 100 of 10,836
IN RE: GARNET SMITH
as 2:2024cv01422
Not Yet Classified:
GARNET SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMES v. WELLPATH et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
WINDEL HOLMES
Defendant:
WELLPATH, RNS BRAD AVENALI, SUPERINTENDENT SCOTT KLINEFELTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON-EL v. BUCKS COUNTY CORR. FACILITY et al
as 2:2024cv01300
Plaintiff:
ALI A.I. HARRISON-EL
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CORR. FACILITY, KELLY REED, SPRNTNDNT. MATILLUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. SUTHERLAND et al
as 1:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
SYLVESTER LEWIS
Defendant:
MARK SUTHERLAND, ANDREW LESLIE, ZANTAC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
GINDRAW v. SANFORD et al
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
TAHMIR GINDRAW
Defendant:
LT. SANFORD and LT. HOUSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. WALKER et al
as 2:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
SHAWN KING
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT TINA WALKER and MR. MATIYASIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. SCI FOREST et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
SYLVESTER LEWIS
Defendant:
SCI FOREST, WELLPATH, NP Eleanor Dorrion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BATCHELOR v. SPAGNOLETTI et al
as 2:2024cv01258
Plaintiff:
STEFAN BATCHELOR
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT SPAGNOLETTI, SUPERINTENDENT J. TERRA, UNIT MANAGER S. GRADY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: TUNSIL
as 2:2024cv01262
Plaintiff:
BARRETT S. TUNSIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON et al v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
PLATINUM HODDIE HARRISON and NIARA BURTON
Defendant:
LAUREL R. HARRY and SUPERINTENDENT PATRICIA THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
