Cases 91 - 100 of 1,004
BOWMAN v. K M SPECIALTY PUMPS
as 3:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
SETH BOWMAN
Defendant:
K M SPECIALTY PUMPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Litts v. General Insulation Inc
as 1:2022cv00923
Plaintiff:
Edward Litts
Defendant:
General Insulation Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act 1993
Litts v. General Insulation Inc
as 1:2022cv00917
Plaintiff:
Edward Litts
Defendant:
General Insulation Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act 1993
Muth v. Reed Construction
as 1:2022cv03428
Plaintiff:
Nicole Muth
Defendant:
Reed Construction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Robbins v. Hinsdale Township High School District 86
as 1:2022cv03010
Plaintiff:
Candace Robbins
Defendant:
Hinsdale Township High School District 86
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Anderson v. Dukes Health System LLC
as 3:2022cv00506
Plaintiff:
Diane Anderson
Defendant:
Dukes Health System LLC doing business as Dukes Memorial Hospital
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Folkers v. Green Stream Company
as 3:2022cv00462
Plaintiff:
Tyler Folkers
Defendant:
Green Stream Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fml Petition for Removal - Family and Medical Leave Act
Hamill v. Plano Molding Company d/b/a Plano Synergy
as 1:2021cv04644
Plaintiff:
Patricia Hamill
Defendant:
Plano Molding Company d/b/a Plano Synergy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Gray v. Gold Star Carriers Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02700
Plaintiff:
Christian Gray
Defendant:
Gold Star Carriers Inc., GSC Transholding LLC, GSC Carriers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2022cv03009
Plaintiff:
Candace Robbins
Defendant:
Hinsdale Township High School District 86
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
