Cases 91 - 100 of 10,599
Stebbins v. USA
as 1:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Randall Richard Stebbins
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Lewis v. Warden of USP Hazelton
as 5:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Vashun Lewis
Respondent:
Warden of USP Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00165
Petitioner:
Marshall Luther Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
McGranahan v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Joseph McGranahan
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., PrimeCare Medical, Inc. and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swiger v. State of West Virginia
as 3:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
Aaron L. Swiger
Respondent:
State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Baisi v. Bleavins et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Vincent Gregory Baisi
Defendant:
Cpl. John Bleavins, Lt. James Irwin, Western Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00099
Petitioner:
Houston P. Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Maloney v. Lovett
as 5:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
Robert Maloney
Respondent:
Warden Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Baisi v. Western Regional Jail
as 3:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Vincent Gregory Baisi
Defendant:
Western Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez-Torres v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00060
Petitioner:
Patricio Ramirez-Torres
Respondent:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
