Cases 101 - 110 of 20,821
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
TrailblazHers Run Co. et al v. Boston Athletic Association et al
as 1:2024cv10950
Plaintiff:
TrailblazHers Run Co., Abeo Powder, Elizabeth Rock and others
Defendant:
Boston Athletic Association, City of Newton and John F. Carmichael Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gould et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS et al
as 3:2024cv30033
Plaintiff:
Rodney Elliot Gould and Jonathan Chad Brown
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Jonathan Kane, Maria C. Pereira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stoops v. No Defendants
as 1:2024cv10957
Plaintiff:
Dorothy J. Stoops
Defendant:
No Defendants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Howell v. Boston Medical Center Hospital, et al
as 24-1142
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER, BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and MASSACHUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL
Howell v. Middlesex Community College, et al
as 24-1143
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COMMUNITY COLLEGE and MASSACHUSETTS REHABILITATION COMMISSION
Williams v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 24-1155
Plaintiff:
SABRINA M. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, JUDGE THERESA A. BISENIUS, JUDGE JENNIFER M.R. ULWICK and others
Howell v. Brookline Bancorp Building Staff and Presidents, et al
as 24-1140
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC., DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Guzman-Perez, et al v. Ojeda-Batista
as 24-1329
Plaintiff:
JENNIE GUZMAN-PEREZ and MARIA HERNANDEZ-SANTIAGO
Defendant:
MANUEL OJEDA-BATISTA, PROFESSIONAL EQUIPMENT CORP. and MOB INVESTMENT CORP.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
