Cases 101 - 110 of 46,721
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CHAPPLE
as 2:2024cv01599
Plaintiff:
ANGELA CHAPPLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CHAPPLE v. GEICO
as 2:2024cv01601
Plaintiff:
ANGELA CHAPPLE
Defendant:
GEICO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sciarra v. Dauphin County Public Defender et al
as 1:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sciarra
Defendant:
Dauphin County Public Defender, Steve Allan Mimms, Deanna Muller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Buckner v. City of New York et al
as 3:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
Shatasia C. Buckner
Defendant:
City of New York, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Ashley Borough Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sciarra v. Dauphin County District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sciarra
Defendant:
Dauphin County District Attorney's Office and John R Canavan, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sciarra v. State Capitol Police Dept et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sciarra
Defendant:
State Capitol Police Dept and Adam Eubanks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
