Cases 101 - 110 of 31,118
Kasper v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
Minnie L. Kasper
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tuttle v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04052
Plaintiff:
Lisa L. Tuttle
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Priester v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Melyssa Priester
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Nelson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Christa A. Nelson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hance v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Allison Stanfield Hance
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dickau v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv01011
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Dickau
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 423 Social Security Act (Disability Insurance Benefit Payments)
Lee v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01137
Plaintiff:
Lia Lee
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pesek v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01139
Plaintiff:
Jason Pesek
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Meh v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01140
Plaintiff:
Nyay Meh
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rubottom-Langeneckert v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lynn Rubottom-Langeneckert
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
