Cases 101 - 110 of 24,268
Ngang v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01106
Plaintiff:
Edith Ngang
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ABM Service Corporation v. Ralph et al
as 3:2024cv03086
Plaintiff:
ABM Service Corporation
Defendant:
Brett Ralph and Bluestone Insurance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Washington Sr. v. Lewis et al
as 4:2024cv04065
Plaintiff:
Mario Devonne Washington Sr.
Defendant:
Nathan Lewis, Kyle Winbigler, Kevin Legate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Harris v. City of Bloomington et al
as 1:2024cv01155
Plaintiff:
Rakeem Harris
Defendant:
City of Bloomington, Nicholas Doage, Jeff Linden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Crayton v. People of Illinois
as 1:2024cv01153
Petitioner:
Keimon Crayton
Respondent:
People of Illinois
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Erdmann v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01151
Plaintiff:
Diane Renee Erdmann
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith v. Webb et al
as 1:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L Smith
Defendant:
Jon Webb, Jeffrey Standard and Ryan Maride
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry's On Main LLC v. Village of Rochester et al
as 3:2024cv03040
Plaintiff:
Henry's On Main, LLC and Henry's On Main LLC
Defendant:
Village of Rochester and Joseph Suerdieck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stone et al v. Local No. 171 Pension Plan
as 1:2024cv01078
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey B. Stone and Eric D Stone
Defendant:
Local No. 171 Pension Plan
People of the State of Illinois, ex. rel Thomas Briddick v. Zhu et al
as 4:2024cv04045
Plaintiff:
People of the State of Illinois, ex rel Thomas P Briddick
Defendant:
Meilan Zhu and Qin Li
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
