Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 101 - 110 of 30,363
Grissett v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02038
Petitioner: Richard Hugh Grissett
Respondent: State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. USA
as 5:2024cv00216
Petitioner: Hosea Loren Lewis
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Stout v. Richie
as 5:2024ct03090
Plaintiff: James Stout
Defendant: Sgt. Richie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIFFITH v. OFFICIALS AT ANSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 1:2024cv00313
Plaintiff: MELISSA ANN GRIFFITH
Defendant: OFFICIALS AT ANSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Azar El v. Cabarrus County Jail et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00243
Petitioner: Rashaud Hussem Azar El doing business as Jerimy Love
Respondent: Cabarrus County Jail, Mike Downs, Angel Gonzalez and others
Interested Party: USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brooks v. USA
as 1:2024cv00101
Petitioner: James Anthony Brooks, Jr.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Navarro-Melendez v. USA
as 1:2024cv00102
Petitioner: Oscar Orlando Navarro-Melendez
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Shook v. McNally et al
as 1:2024cv00100
Plaintiff: Jesse L. Shook
Defendant: Charles J. McNally, Norma Biddix and Mike Slagle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SWINSON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00304
Petitioner: CHARLES ANTHONY SWINSON, JR.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Armstrong v. USA
as 3:2024cv00375
Petitioner: Dontay Lafon Armstrong
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?