Cases 101 - 110 of 3,197
Bandy v. Marshall et al
as 3:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
David Lawrence Bandy
Defendant:
William Marshall, III, Jason Hudson and Shane Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gottfried v. Pacholke
as 5:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Michael Gottfried
Defendant:
Correctional Officer C. Pacholke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wasanyi v. Aramark Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
David M. Wasanyi
Defendant:
Aramark Services Incorporated and Brittany Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Daniels et al
as 2:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Kelly Crawford
Defendant:
Camryn T. Daniels, Boone County Sheriff's Office, Boone County Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lawhorn v. Mayle et al
as 3:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lawhorn
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Patrick Mayle, Nurse Jane Doe and Nurse John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thacker v. McCoy et al
as 3:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Ross Moore Thacker
Defendant:
Dr./MAT Emery McCoy and P.A. Alicia Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Fleischer v. Haskins et al
as 5:2023cv00294
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fleischer
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Haskins, Correctional Nurse Raymond Graham and John Does 1-11
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Peters
as 5:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Jason Jerell Smith
Defendant:
Ms. Corlette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Larry v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Orlando Larry
Defendant:
John Doe, or in the Alternative, Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Boughers v. Phizer Incorporated et al
as 3:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
Chester Allen Boughers
Defendant:
Phizer Incorporated, Albert Bourla and Abingdon Regional Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
