Cases 111 - 120 of 26,349
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SCOTT v. MCFARLANE
as 7:2024cv00019
Petitioner:
DARRELL BERNARD SCOTT, JR
Respondent:
ANDREW MCFARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE) and ANDREW MCFARLANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FIFFIA v. WALMART INC
as 7:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
NICHOLE FIFFIA
Defendant:
WALMART INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
NAVIGATORS SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. CUTTING EDGE LANDSCAPING LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00121
Defendant:
Navigators Specialty Insurance Company, GRANGE INSURANCE COMPANY, Cade Riley Bloodsworth and others
Claimant:
Cutting Edge Landscaping, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
JOHNSON v. USA
as 7:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
TORRIEO MONTE JOHNSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
TOWNES v. DAVIS et al
as 7:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
DARIAN TOWNES
Defendant:
HEATHER DAVIS and WARDEN/C-T VALDOSTA STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STAGGERS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
as 7:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
SHARRARD STAGGERS
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, CANDICE BROSE, VALDOSTA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0242 Deprivation of rights under color of law
POPE v. COOPER et al
as 5:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE WAYNE POPE
Defendant:
DEPUTY COOPER, DEPUTY ROSS, DEPUTY FRITZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
