Cases 111 - 120 of 15,675
Paranteau v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Georgina Lee Paranteau
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Tammy Spader v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1683
Plaintiff:
Tammy L. Spader
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Northcutt v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Angela Northcutt
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Robinson v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 1:2024cv01010
Plaintiff:
Recarlos Keadrian Robinson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Shumaker v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05017
Plaintiff:
Donna Fay Shumaker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dukhorn v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01101
Plaintiff:
Brock W. Dukhorn
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Schwickerath v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Schwickerath
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 423 Social Security Act (Disability Insurance Benefit Payments)
Serocke v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Courtney Serocke
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hardy v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Tabitha Hardy
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Friesz v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Mike Loren Friesz
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
