Cases 111 - 120 of 2,560
Mel Marin v. Walmart, Inc.
as 23-1863
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mel Marin
Defendant / Appellee:
Walmart, Inc.
Joshua Lapin v. EverQuote, et al
as 23-2184
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joshua A. Lapin
Defendant / Appellee:
EverQuote, Inc., also known as EverQuote and John Doe, Sender, doing business as BuzzBarrelReview.com, doing business as dzlosurverys.com, doing business as emails-jobsdelivered.com, doing business as Entirelybelieve.com, doing business as JobsDeliver.com, doing business as expectcarecare.com,
United States of America v. Marple
as 6:2023cv03138
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ray L. Marple
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345 Fraud Injunction Statute
Gore v. Epiq Systems Inc
as 2:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Glenda Gore
Defendant:
Epiq Systems Inc and Epiq Systems Inc doing business as Epiq Global
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Greene et al v. Johnston
as 4:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
Debra L Greene and Kelly Pytluk
Defendant:
Ada Johnston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Waller v. Henkel Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv00486
Plaintiff:
Valerie Waller
Defendant:
Henkel Corporation and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Brown v. Lucas et al
as 0:2023cv01464
Plaintiff:
Shawn Brown
Defendant:
Jay H Lucas, North Shore Forensic Psychology, Dr. Travis Tomford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Borrero v. Compass Group USA, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
Andres Borrero
Defendant:
Compass Group USA, Inc. doing business as Canteen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Fantroy v. Oakley, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00433
Plaintiff:
Mark Fantroy
Defendant:
Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Brown v. Gosling
as 0:2023cv01388
Plaintiff:
Shawn Christopher Brown
Defendant:
Aaron Gosling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
