Cases 121 - 130 of 101,249
Mayfield v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02216
Plaintiff:
Shunte Lamont Mayfield
Defendant:
Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEWART v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00775
Petitioner:
ROBERT STEWART
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kevin Smith v. Officer Foster, et al
as 24-1391
Plaintiff:
KEVIN E. SMITH
Defendant:
OFFICER FOSTER, OFFICER MARTIN, OFFICER BENNETT and others
Challie Gray v. John Poor, et al
as 24-1780
Plaintiff:
CHALLIE A. GRAY
Defendant:
JOHN POOR, Sergeant, JAIME DOWNS, Officer and RICHARD FLEURY, Officer
Burton v. Wexford Healthcare Sources et al
as 3:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
Marcus R Burton, Sr
Defendant:
Wexford Healthcare Sources, Christine Vineyard, Dr. Meyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Market et al
as 2:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
Terrell Harris
Defendant:
Officer Market, Officer Shoup and Milwaukee Police Department District 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyce v. DeHaan
as 2:2024cv00575
Petitioner:
Ladarius Boyce
Respondent:
Suzanne DeHaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Borders v. Lafayett Police Deportment The et al
as 4:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lee Borders
Defendant:
Lafayett Police Deportment The, Ian O'Shields and Robison
Not Yet Classified:
BRANCHVILLE E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Sherman et al
as 3:2024cv03113
Plaintiff:
Joseph Austin
Defendant:
Joseph Sherman, Michael Hendricks and Bobby Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. DIVISION OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00790
Petitioner:
JAMES MICHAEL BROWN
Respondent:
DIVISION OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
