Cases 121 - 130 of 90,115
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hines v. Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston et al
as 2:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Tasha Hines
Defendant:
Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston and Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Brown et al v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Danae Brown and Amanda Andrews
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4311 Uniformed Service Employment/Reemployment Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Luther v. Alatex Network Services, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Christen Luther
Defendant:
Alatex Network Services and Roy Fryer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2024cv00234
Petitioner:
Tony Lee Smith
Respondent:
Phillip Mitchell and A.D.O.C.
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
