Cases 141 - 150 of 23,101
Ruiz-Romero v. Santiago-Colon
as 24-1333
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO RUIZ-ROMERO
Defendant:
PABLO SANTIAGO-COLON
dais deapocalypse bey v. Clapprood, et al
as 24-1312
Plaintiff:
RA DAIS DEAPOCALYPSE BEY
Defendant:
CHERYL CLAPPROOD, Superintendent, Springfield Police Department and CRAIG MOREL, President, CJ Towing
Ruiz-Romero v. Department of State of Puerto Rico, et al
as 24-1334
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO RUIZ-ROMERO
Defendant:
STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUERTO RICO and PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO
US v. West
as 24-1127
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
DAVID H. WEST, TOWN OF HAMPTON FALLS, NH and NEW RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LLC
Raheb v. Delaware North Companies, Inc. - Boston, et al
as 24-1230
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER RAHEB
Defendant:
DELAWARE NORTH COMPANIES, INC. - BOSTON, d/b/a TD Garden and UG2, LLC
Emigrant Mortgage Company, Inc., et al v. Bourke, et al
as 24-1210
Plaintiff:
EMIGRANT MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC. and RETAINED REALTY, INC.
Defendant:
DONEYN BOURKE and WILLIAM HAYWARD, SR.
Leavitt v. United Services Automobile Association, et al
as 24-1115
Plaintiff:
ALLAN M. LEAVITT, Individually, and as Class Representative and JOHN DOE 1-100
Defendant:
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, a Texas Department of Insurance Regulated Reciprocal Inter-insurance Exchange and Subsidiary, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY and COMMERCE INSURANCE COMPANY
Rodriguez Then v. US
as 24-1120
Petitioner:
LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUE THEN and LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ THEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Benitez Caceres, et al v. Seven Hills Foundation
as 24-1168
Plaintiff:
MIRCA BENITEZ CACERES and GUILLERMO CACERES
Defendant:
SEVEN HILLS FOUNDATION, BRADLEY HOSPITAL and RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL
US v. Yu
as 24-1325
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
HAOYANG YU, a/k/a Jack Yu, a/k/a Harry Yu, a/k/a Jack Tricon
Interested Party:
ANALOG DEVICES, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
