Cases 141 - 150 of 16,909
C.A.T. Global Inc. v. SGL TRUCKING LTD.
as 2:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
C.A.T. Global Inc.
Defendant:
SGL TRUCKING LTD.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11707 Carmack Amendment
MARTIN v. AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MARTIN and CARING HANDS PARTNERS
Defendant:
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Co LLC v. Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board, et al
as 24-1099
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE CO LLC
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL HEARING BOARD, STEVEN C. BECKMAN, BERNARD A. LABUSKES, JR. and others
Intervenor:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Frazier Industrial Company v. PPT Industrial Machines, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00715
Plaintiff:
FRAZIER INDUSTRIAL COMPANY
Defendant:
PPT Industrial Machines, LLC d/b/a Pacific Press Technologies and Right Lane Industries, LLC
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Co LLC v. Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board, et al
as 24-1142
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE CO LLC
Defendant:
STEVEN C. BECKMAN, SARAH J. CLARK, BERNARD A. LABUSKES, JR. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHELLE A. COLEMAN
Intervenor:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
SON V. LYNCH, ET AL.
as 2:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
Yong Chul Son
Defendant:
Thomas G. Lynch, Andrew S. Strauss, Michael Skinder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaunt v. Perry County Children and Youth Services et al
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Dominique Plaunt
Defendant:
Perry County Children and Youth Services and John Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 2:2024cv00790
Petitioner:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
ROSE v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.
as 2:2023cv23321
Petitioner:
WILLIAM ROSE
Respondent:
T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Interested Party:
CELLULAR TOUCH WIRELESS, INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
