Cases 141 - 150 of 475,567
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv50181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Murphy v. Dalke et al
as 3:2024cv50180
Plaintiff:
John J. Murphy
Defendant:
Lt. Dalke, Lt. Remers and Warden Of Dixon C.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TERESHKUN et al v. KLM TRANS, INC.
as 1:2024cv04000
Plaintiff:
OLEG TERESHKUN, ROMAN YERMAK, LIUBOMYR OSTASHUK and others
Defendant:
KLM TRANS, INC., IHOR KOTSYULYM and Viktor KOTSYULYM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Marable v. Southern Illinois Healthcare Foundation, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01279
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Marable
Defendant:
Southern Illinois Healthcare Foundation, Inc., MD Anne Nash, NP-C Brandy Holthaus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Cantu v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq01272
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Eleno Salinas Cantu
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mitchell v. Stateville NRC
as 3:2024cv01276
Plaintiff:
Willis Mitchell
Defendant:
Stateville NRC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atrella Reynolds v. Scottrade, Inc./TD Ameritrade, Inc., et al
as 24-1842
Plaintiff:
ATRELLA REYNOLDS
Defendant:
SCOTTRADE, INC./TD AMERITRADE, INC., CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and others
Peterson v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00593
Plaintiff:
Cristen Rose Peterson
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
