Cases 161 - 170 of 8,493
Harding v. Meet Up.com et al
as 1:2024cv10382
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harding
Defendant:
Meet Up.com and David Siegel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mitchell v. Revere Housing Authority
as 1:2023cv13124
Plaintiff:
Charlina Mitchell
Defendant:
Revere Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Bey v. Commonwealth of MA
as 1:2024cv10362
Plaintiff:
Jamhal Talib Abdullah Bey
Defendant:
Commonwealth of MA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. Synchrony Bank et al
as 3:2024cv30027
Plaintiff:
Paul Jones
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank, Monarch Recovery Management Inc., Ratchford Law Group P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hakim Douglas v. Suffolk County District Attorney's Office et al
as 4:2024cv40002
Plaintiff:
Tyron Jarome Hakim Douglas
Defendant:
Suffolk County District Attorney's Office and William A. Hinton Laboratory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv13186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Larocque v. Deschene et al
as 1:2023cv13252
Plaintiff:
Carl Larocque
Defendant:
Robert J. Deschene, Matthew M. Wisnewski, Craig Lussier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reason v. McDermott et al
as 1:2024cv10044
Plaintiff:
Jamie Anthony Reason
Defendant:
Patrick W McDermott, Danielle Frane, Alexander Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
