Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in West Virginia
Cases 11 - 20 of 10,607
Chafin v. Caudill et al
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff: Christopher Chafin
Defendant: Steve Caudill, Superintendent Jason Hutson, Joseph Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00147
Plaintiff: Greg Martin
Defendant: Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and Sandra May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00058
Petitioner: Kenneth White
Respondent: R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stutler v. MCCJ
as 5:2024cv00094
Petitioner: Aric Stutler
Respondent: MCCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Blystone v. Bayliss, Warden
as 5:2024cv00092
Petitioner: Charles Blystone
Respondent: Melissa Bayliss, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Damron v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00057
Petitioner: Christopher R. Damron
Respondent: Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Eldridge v. Antonelli
as 5:2024cv00093
Plaintiff: David Eldridge
Defendant: Bryan M. Antonelli, Unknown Mims, Unknown McNear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00243
Petitioner: Calvin Moore
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Rodgers v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00241
Petitioner: Robert Rodgers
Respondent: W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rosser-Burch v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00131
Petitioner: Teyon Rosser-Burch
Respondent: W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?