Cases 11 - 20 of 180
Miller v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2022cv00506
Plaintiff:
Alan Eugene Miller
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Terry Raybon and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2022cv00497
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Eugene Smith
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2022cv00505
Plaintiff:
Westley Devone Harris
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lockhart v. Raybon et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 3:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
Courtney Lockhart
Defendant:
Terry Raybon and John Q. Hamm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reynolds v. Dunn
as 4:2018cv00236
Respondent:
Jefferson S Dunn
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Lockhart v. Raybon
as 2:2022cv00368
Petitioner:
Courtney Larrell Lockhart
Respondent:
Warden Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mashburn v. Thomas
as 1:2014cv01829
Petitioner:
Ellis Louis Mashburn, JR
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn
Respondent:
Kim Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
James v. Raybon
as 1:2022cv00152
Petitioner:
Joe Nathan James
Respondent:
Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stanley v. Dunn
as 1:2022cv00154
Petitioner:
Anthony Stanley
Respondent:
Jefferson S Dunn
Defendant:
John Hamm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
White v. Dunn
as 2:2021cv01700
Petitioner:
Justin Matthew White
Respondent:
Jefferson S Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
