Cases 21 - 30 of 10,521
LOUTH CALLAN RENEWABLES LLC v. TANGENT ENERGY SOLUTIONS
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
LOUTH CALLAN RENEWABLES LLC
Defendant:
TANGENT ENERGY SOLUTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
LOUTH CALLAN RENEWABLES LLC v. TANGENT ENERGY SOLUTIONS
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
LOUTH CALLAN RENEWABLES LLC
Defendant:
TANGENT ENERGY SOLUTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
LOUTH CALLAN RENEWABLES LLC v. TANGENT ENERGY SOLUTIONS
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
LOUTH CALLAN RENEWABLES LLC
Defendant:
TANGENT ENERGY SOLUTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
THATCHER v. USA
as 2:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
MATTHEW THATCHER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BORDERA et al v. USAA
as 2:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A BORDERA and STACY D BORDERA
Defendant:
USAA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
MACHIAS SAVINGS BANK v. F/V KATHERINE & ROBERTA
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
MACHIAS SAVINGS BANK
Defendant:
F/V KATHERINE & ROBERTA
Claimant:
MIDCOAST MARINE ELECTRONICS INC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 31325 Preferred Mortgage Lien on Vessel
GRAHAM v. MAINEHEALTH, et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
PETER E GRAHAM, MD
Defendant:
MAINEHEALTH doing business as MAINEHEALTH CANCER CARE doing business as MAINE MEDICAL PARTNERS and AMIT SANYAL, MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
KILMARTIN v. KILMARTIN
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY P KILMARTIN
Defendant:
DEBBIE KILMARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
