Other Statutes Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 86,722
APPLIED BALLISTICS INC. v. SHELTERED WINGS, INC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00552
Plaintiff: APPLIED BALLISTICS INC.
Defendant: SHELTERED WINGS, INC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
Lavi et al v. UNRWA USA National Committee Inc.
as 1:2024cv00312
Plaintiff: Lishay Lavi, Noach Newman, Adin Gess and others
Defendant: UNRWA USA National Committee Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
THE PHILADELPHIA REGIONAL PORT AUTHORITY v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al
as 2:2024cv01008
Plaintiff: THE PHILADELPHIA REGIONAL PORT AUTHORITY
Defendant: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, DISTRICT COMMANDER FOR THE PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JEFFREY BEEMAN, CHIEF OF THE REGULATORY BRANCH FOR THE PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, TODD A. SCHAIBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181 Environment: Review of Agency Action
USA v. Roger Sedlak
as 24-1785
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ROGER SEDLAK
USA v. Delancey Melvin
as 24-1826
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DELANCEY MELVIN
USA v. Nazhir Regis
as 24-1836
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: NAZHIR REGIS
USA v. Christian Womack
as 24-1816
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CHRISTIAN DIOR WOMACK, also known as GUCCI PRADA
Maxo Jean v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1846
Petitioner: MAXO JEAN
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1782
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Walmart Inc. Securities Litigation, et al, et al
as 24-1818
Plaintiff: KIM KENGLE, as trustee of the Kim K.Kengle 2000 Trust and ROSEANNE LACY
Defendant: WALMART INC, C. DOUGLAS MCMILLON and M. BRETT BIGGS, JR.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?