Cases 31 - 40 of 3,103
Barfield-Peak v. Rudolph
as 8:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Terrijana Barfield-Peak
Defendant:
Angie Rudolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. National Action Network Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv03037
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rogers
Defendant:
National Action Network Inc., Alfred Charles Sharpton, Jr., Peter Joseph Gleason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sipple v. Kramer et al
as 4:2024cv03045
Plaintiff:
Adam T Sipple
Defendant:
Deputy Roland Kramer and Devin Ruff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Emrit v. Grammys Awards on CBS
as 4:2024cv03005
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Grammys Awards on CBS doing business as The Recording Academy/National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences (NARAS)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zika v. Calvert et al
as 4:2023cv03249
Plaintiff:
Garry Zika
Defendant:
Christopher Calvert and Matthew Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Barber v. Doe 1 et al
as 8:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
RaySean Barber
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Riddle v. Omaha Public Schools
as 8:2023cv00547
Plaintiff:
Justin Riddle and Justin E. Riddle
Defendant:
Omaha Public Schools
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stark v. City of Omaha, Nebraska et al
as 4:2023cv03242
Plaintiff:
Jack A. Stark
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Nebraska, Todd Schmaderer, Nicolas Yanez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
