Cases 31 - 40 of 907
Jones v. State Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
State Police Department and Buckhannon Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lyons-Price v. United States Probation Office of Wheeling, WV (et al.)
as 5:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Lyons-Price
Defendant:
United States Probation Office of Wheeling, WV (et al.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lyons-Price v. Boring
as 5:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Lyons-Price
Defendant:
Kylee Boring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Hope Community Church v. The Honorable Mac Warner
as 3:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
Hope Community Church
Defendant:
The Honorable Mac Warner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pugh v. Coleman et al
as 2:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Ethan Pugh
Defendant:
Michael Sean Coleman, April Riley, Steven Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
