Cases 31 - 40 of 1,025
Penton v. Haq et al
as 4:2023cv04212
Plaintiff:
Jordan Penton
Defendant:
Yasir Haq, . Tinwalla, Paula Lodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Bygrave et al
as 4:2024cv04004
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sullivan
Defendant:
Natalia Bygrave, . Hawk, . Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Aramark Food Services Corp et al
as 4:2024cv04019
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sullivan
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services Corp, . Coates, . Kuldfelt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Caskey et al
as 2:2023cv02265
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bell
Defendant:
Herbert Caskey, Liberty Health Case Corporation and Other Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Donathan et al
as 4:2023cv04210
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sullivan
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Erin Posey and Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. Keithley et al
as 4:2023cv04208
Plaintiff:
Andre Winston
Defendant:
Tracy Keithley, A Hoyt, S Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Street v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv16308
Plaintiff:
Carl Street
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Doctor of Division 8, Medical Doctor of Cook County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin Fitzpatrick v. Robert Busche, et al
as 23-3053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN C. FITZPATRICK
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT BUSCHE, Doctor, JOHN DOE, Sergeant, B.K., JOHN DOE 2 and others
Racanelli v. Reische
as 4:2023cv04196
Plaintiff:
Joseph Racanelli
Defendant:
Amanda Reische
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Donathan et al
as 4:2023cv04203
Plaintiff:
Milton Anderson
Defendant:
Gregory Donathan, C. Parsons and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
