Cases 31 - 40 of 7,343
BOYKINS v. GILBERT et al
as 1:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
MAURICE BOYKINS
Defendant:
GILBERT, GORD, UNIT TEAM MANAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERDUE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY K. PERDUE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DENNIS REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AYON v. FOSTER et al
as 1:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
MANUEL GARCIA AYON, JR.
Defendant:
FOSTER, AFOLAYAN, BISHOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. ZACTECKY et al
as 1:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
THADDEUS L. RODRIGUEZ, SR.
Defendant:
ZACTECKY, LYTKE, MICHELLE STEAL COMMANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLUE v. ELKINS et al
as 2:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BLUE
Defendant:
CRYSTAL ELKINS, MIAIAH J. POTWYN, MARK D. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLACE v. GAHAN et al
as 4:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WADE WALLACE, SR.
Defendant:
JEFF GAHAN, TODD BAILEY, HATFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. FORESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORESTAL, F. EMI and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. BELLO et al
as 1:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BELLO, BAKER, AKENADI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
KENNEDY EUGENE BUTLER
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., MARK SEVIER and BRILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORMAN v. DELICE
as 1:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
KIR MOORMAN
Defendant:
J. DENICE and J. DELICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
