Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 31 - 40 of 9,997
BENITEZ-FLORES v. USA
as 1:2024cv00136
Petitioner: JORGE LUIS BENITEZ-FLORES
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PRADO v. USA
as 1:2024cv00288
Petitioner: ALEXIS JEOVANNI ESCANDON PRADO
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MCCLAM v. USA
as 1:2024cv00289
Petitioner: WARDELL JERMAINE MCCLAM, JR.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
GRIFFITH v. UNKNOWN OFFICIALS AT ANSON CORRECTIONAL
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff: MELISSA ANN GRIFFITH
Defendant: UNKNOWN OFFICIALS AT ANSON CORRECTIONAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. ISHEE
as 1:2024cv00182
Petitioner: SIMARON D. HILL
Respondent: TODD ISHEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMALL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00169
Petitioner: STEPHEN ALLEN SMALL, JR.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ALLEN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00297
Petitioner: MICHAEL THOMAS ALLEN
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
LINDSEY EL BEY v. CLODFELTER
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff: DERRICK JERVON LINDSAY EL BEY
Defendant: District Attorney T. Lynn Clodfelter and STANLY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODBERRY v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff: MANDRAIL JAMAR WOODBERRY
Defendant: IRA KNIGHT and REGIONAL DIRECTOR CENTRAL OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
HOOVER v. WADDELL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff: ANTHONY LEON HOOVER
Defendant: STEPHEN WADDELL, ROY A. COOPER III, ELIZABETH N. STRICKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?