Cases 31 - 40 of 441,480
Kirksey v. Leseur et al
as 7:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Kirksey
Defendant:
Chief FNU Leseur and C. Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kindred v. Trevino
as 6:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Kindred
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Trevino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victory Business Solutions, LTD et al v. Lihaona, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Victory Armoring Solutions Global, Victory Business Solutions, LTD, Tac Americas, Ltd and others
Defendant:
Lihaona, LLC, Ronald Trent Kimball, Factory Hill, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Dunn v. Miller
as 3:2024cv01105
Plaintiff:
Virginia T Dunn
Defendant:
Bradley B Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Brown v. Abney
as 3:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Madeline Nicole Brown
Defendant:
Daniel Eugene Abney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. Dart Transit Company [US DOT#75525] et al
as 2:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Gerrick Darell Williams
Defendant:
Dart Transit Company [US DOT#75525], Fleetline doing business as Dart Transit Company, Quantrez Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
SCR Networks LLC v. Cisco Systems Inc.
as 2:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
SCR Networks LLC
Defendant:
Cisco Systems Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
