Cases 51 - 60 of 737,284
ZAHAN v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01872
Plaintiff:
EASRAT ZAHAN
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC, RASIER-PA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
RIEBER CONTRACTING, INC. v. MCDONALD BUILDING COMPANY LLC
as 2:2024cv01875
Plaintiff:
RIEBER CONTRACTING, INC.
Defendant:
MCDONALD BUILDING COMPANY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
GOLDNER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01868
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GOLDNER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
DOE v. LACOLMB et al
as 2:2024cv01843
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
PIERRE LACOLMB, C/O GINDRAW, BLANCHE CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woytek v. GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01869
Plaintiff:
Misty Woytek
Defendant:
GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hooks v. SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01871
Plaintiff:
Amira K Hooks
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
