Cases 51 - 60 of 823
ADELPHIA GATEWAY, LLC v. TEMPORARY EASEMENTS FOR 2.306 ACRES IN BOROUGH OF TRAINER, DELAWARE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NUMBER 46-00000-00482-00 et al
as 2:2020cv01011
Plaintiff:
ADELPHIA GATEWAY, LLC
Defendant:
CONGOLEUM CORPORATION and TEMPORARY EASEMENTS FOR 2.306 ACRES IN BOROUGH OF TRAINER, DELAWARE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NUMBER 46-00-00482-00
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
ADELPHIA GATEWAY, LLC v. CERTAIN EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY NECESSARY TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN AN 18" NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINE IN EAST GOSHEN TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NUMBER 53-00006C-65, 202 MARIE ROAD, WEST CHESTE
as 2:2020cv00997
Plaintiff:
ADELPHIA GATEWAY, LLC
Defendant:
ANNMARIE GUERIERA, CERTAIN EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY NECESSARY TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN AN 18" NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINE IN EAST GOSHEN TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NUMBER 53-6C-65, and ROBERT C. GUERIERA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
ADELPHIA GATEWAY, LLC v. CERTAIN EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY NECESSARY TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN AN 18" NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINE IN EAST GOSHEN TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NUMBER 53-00006C-64 et al
as 2:2020cv00996
Defendant:
CERTAIN EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY NECESSARY TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN AN 18" NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINE IN EAST GOSHEN TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NUMBER 53-6C-64, DIANA MASHA, AND ALL UNKNOWN OWNERS and others
Plaintiff:
ADELPHIA GATEWAY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
ADELPHIA GATEWAY, LLC v. CERTAIN EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY NECESSARY TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN AN 18" NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINE IN SALFORD TOWNSHIP, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NUMBER 44-00000-01507-00-00006, 449 RIDGE ROAD, T
as 2:2020cv00998
Plaintiff:
ADELPHIA GATEWAY, LLC
Defendant:
CERTAIN EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY NECESSARY TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN AN 18" NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINE IN SALFORD TOWNSHIP, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NUMBER and MICHAEL R. TORRES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
MILLTOWN-FORD AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2019cv21494
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, US BANK-COLL AFT/SASS MUN V DTR, US BANK-COLL AFT/SASS MUNI VI DTR and others
Plaintiff:
THE MILLTOWN-FORD AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
UGI Sunbury, LLC v. Permanent Easement of
as 4:2020cv00226
Defendant:
Robert A. Grayston, Jr., Melissa E. Grayston, The Northumberland National Bank and others
Plaintiff:
UGI Sunbury, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
SMALIS et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2019cv01609
Plaintiff:
LIPSOSS COPRP CONSTRUCTORS, DESPINA SMALIS and ANASTASIOS SMALIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, DONNA MURPHY, STEVEN MALNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States Of America v. 80,794 Square Feet of Land, More or Less, Situated in the City of Harrisburg, Dauphin County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2018cv00532
Defendant:
Metro Bank, PPL Electric Utilities Corp., Harrisburg City Treasurer and others
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Amicus Curiae:
Dauphin County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. O.O4 ACRES OF PERMANENT EASEMENT AND 1.38 ACRES OF TEMPORARY EASEMENT IN THE TOWNSHIP OF OLD BRIDGE et al
as 3:2019cv18366
Defendant:
Bruce Carta, Diane Hollasch, 0.04 Acres Of Permanent Easement and 1.38 Acres Of Temporary Easement In The Township Of Old Bridge, Middlesex County, New Jersey and others
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
SMALIS et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2019cv01066
Defendant:
DEPT OF BUILDING INSPECTIONS, DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS, CITY OF PITTSBURGH and others
Plaintiff:
LIPSOSS CORP CONSTRUCTORS and ANASTASIOS ERNEST SMALIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
