Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Cases 61 - 70 of 51,618
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00354
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Muhammad v. Kane We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00700
Plaintiff: Walid Abdullah Muhammad
Defendant: Yvette Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00704
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Greene v. The Parole Board of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 3:2024cv00691
Plaintiff: Michael Greene
Defendant: The Parole Board Of The Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Endless Mountain Behavioral Health Center Inc. v. Endless Mountains Extended Care, LLC
as 4:2024cv00701
Plaintiff: Endless Mountain Behavioral Health Center Inc.
Defendant: Endless Mountains Extended Care, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Henry Molded Products, Inc. v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00705
Plaintiff: Henry Molded Products, Inc.
Defendant: The Cincinnati Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Brotzman v. Posey
as 3:2024cv00703
Plaintiff: John Brotzman
Defendant: Argil Posey, II and Nicolas Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peck v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00702
Plaintiff: Donald James Peck
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cobb v. Neer
as 3:2024cv00699
Plaintiff: Helen Cobb
Defendant: Audrey A. Neer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?