Cases 61 - 70 of 31,109
Northern v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Northern
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ness v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Michael Ness
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Spates v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Saterika Spates
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Isham v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Matthew Isham
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Gustafson v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Brandon Gustafson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Ellison v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03100
Plaintiff:
Carl E Ellison
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Hilliard v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2024cv05039
Plaintiff:
Latitia D. Hilliard
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Watts v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2024cv02023
Plaintiff:
Tristan J. Watts
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Jenkins v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2024cv05037
Plaintiff:
Jay M. Jenkins
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Nichols v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Matthew Nichols
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
