Cases 61 - 70 of 8,751
Neff v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Anthony Neff
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Markel Carr
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kumar v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Anshul Kumar
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman v. Williams et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Matthew Norman
Defendant:
Karen Williams, Ventress Correctional Facility and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cowart v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
John Cowart
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alonso v. McClain et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Santiago Alonso
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilkes v. Johnson et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Randall Wilkes
Defendant:
Steve Johnson, Dana Howell and Rick Chancey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Security and Medical Staff at Elmore Correctional Facility (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Dale Duncan
Defendant:
Security and Medical Staff at Elmore Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Tom Scott
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
