Cases 61 - 70 of 180
Spencer v. Dunn
as 2:2016cv01877
Petitioner:
Kerry M Spencer
Respondent:
Jefferson S Dunn
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Van Pelt v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv01849
Petitioner:
Kim Van Pelt
Respondent:
Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Arthur v. Dunn et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2016cv00866
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Arthur
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn , Anne Adams Hill and Cynthia Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Stewart et al
as 2:2016cv01758
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Woods
Respondent:
Cynthia Stewart and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Borden v. Dunn et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2016cv00733
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lynn Borden
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn and Cynthia Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sneed v. Dunn
as 5:2016cv01442
Petitioner:
Ulysses Charles Sneed
Respondent:
Jefferson S Dunn
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark v. Alabama Department of Corrections
as 1:2016cv00454
Petitioner:
Charles Gregory Clark
Respondent:
Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Death Penalty)
Davis v. Gordy et al
as 1:2016cv01041
Petitioner:
Derrick Lamar Davis
Respondent:
Christopher Gordy and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Yeomans v. Dunn (DEATH PENALTY)
as 1:2016cv00455
Plaintiff:
James Donald Yeomans
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. Dunn et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2016cv00364
Plaintiff:
David Wilson
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn and Carter Davenport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
