Cases 61 - 70 of 71,127
ORR v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, BUTLER, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROYAL & SUN ALLIANCE INSURANCE LIMITED v. AIR GENERAL, INC.
as 1:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Limited
Defendant:
Air General Inc and AIR GENERAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MARCHANT v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 2:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
AUTUMN MARCHANT
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, AMELIA BRUNER, CHRISTINA NUDI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WINDERS v. OLSEN
as 3:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WINDERS
Defendant:
AMY OLSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
THORBECKE v. MOOR et al
as 1:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
LEO B. THORBECKE
Defendant:
Edward R. Moor and Moor Law Office, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
ENGLAND v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A.D. ENGLAND
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
TISHNER v. PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2024cv00724
Petitioner:
JOSHUA W. TISHNER
Respondent:
PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SAMS v. PRETORIOUS
as 2:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
RAYMOND D. SAMS
Respondent:
TRICIA PRETORIOUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JEWEL v. KNOX COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT. et al
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY GENE JEWEL, JR.
Defendant:
KNOX COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT. and DOUG VANTLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
