Cases 61 - 70 of 1,867
Rhodes v. Columbia Banking Systems Inc
as 1:2024cv10036
Plaintiff:
Roberts Rhodes
Defendant:
Columbia Banking Systems Inc doing business as Umpqua Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Canterbury v. Performance Health Technology, Ltd.
as 1:2024cv10035
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Canterbury
Defendant:
Performance Health Technology, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Strucke et al v. Midland Financial Co et al
as 1:2023cv12771
Plaintiff:
Darryl Strucke
Defendant:
Midland Financial Co, Ipswitch Inc and Progress Software Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Depoian v. Berger
as 1:2023cv13063
Plaintiff:
Sarah Depoian
Defendant:
Merle Berger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Mercado v. Carrington et al
as 1:2024cv10003
Plaintiff:
Leslie Mercado
Defendant:
Alfred Carrington and Vida Carrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Williams v. Williams
as 1:2023cv13191
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Williams
Defendant:
Rayon Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Harris v. Pension Benefit Information, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv12816
Plaintiff:
Kelly Harris
Defendant:
Pension Benefit Information, LLC doing business as PBI Research Services and Progress Software Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murray v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv30122
Plaintiff:
Matthew Murray
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
French v. Radius Global Solutions LLC
as 1:2023cv12982
Plaintiff:
Hillary French
Defendant:
Radius Global Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Madden v. Radius Global Solutions LLC
as 1:2023cv12981
Plaintiff:
William Madden
Defendant:
Radius Global Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
