Cases 71 - 80 of 65,642
Nineteenseventynine LLC et al v. ASR Group International, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv01525
Plaintiff:
Nineteenseventynine LLC doing business as Breakfast Joynt, The and Sublime Surprise LLC doing business as Hot Java
Defendant:
ASR Group International, Inc., American Sugar Refining, Inc., Domino Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Association of American Railroads v. Jacobson et al
as 0:2024cv01522
Plaintiff:
Association of American Railroads
Defendant:
Bob Jacobson, Paul Marquart and Keith Ellison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Behm v. General Motors LLC
as 0:2024cv01517
Plaintiff:
Michael Behm
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, OnStar, LLC and LexisNexis Risk Solutions Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Cowden v. United States Department of the Treasury et al
as 4:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
Megan H. Cowden
Defendant:
United States Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Sanford et al v. Morris et al
as 6:2024cv03124
Plaintiff:
David Sanford, Drew Sanford, Revocable Trust Agreement of David K. Sanford and others
Defendant:
Jim Morris, Paul Freeman, TRock Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
John Fortenberry v. United States
as 24-1880
Appellant:
John Richard Fortenberry
Respondent:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hunter v. Dave Billion, Auto et al
as 4:2023cv04189
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Hunter v. Dave Billion, Auto et al
as 5:2023cv05071
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
