Cases 71 - 80 of 9,933
Newkirk-Goethe et al v. Haier US Appliance Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01659
Plaintiff:
Michelle Newkirk-Goethe and Terrence Goethe
Defendant:
Haier US Appliance Solutions, Inc. doing business as GE Appliances, Haier America Company, L.L.C., Haier America Trading, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Medina v. Valdez
as 6:2024cv00727
Plaintiff:
Anthony Medina
Defendant:
Jorge A. Valdez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Bromaghim v. Ligon
as 2:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Lynn Bromaghim
Defendant:
Lee Ann Ligon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle
Wren et al v. Stokes et al
as 1:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Michael Wren and Quarneice Wren
Defendant:
Michael Stokes and Saddle Creek Transportation Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Chrisseda Columbus, et al v. Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc., et al
as 24-10539
Plaintiff:
CHRISSEDA COLUMBUS and KENTRELL COLUMBUS
Defendant:
CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. and ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Ball v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv00932
Plaintiff:
Rohan Ball
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Loveira v. Plaisted
as 6:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Francisco Javier Loveira
Defendant:
Mitchel Alan Plaisted
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Shields v. Dexter
as 8:2024cv00929
Plaintiff:
Noah Shields
Defendant:
Abigail Dexter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
BALL v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv00931
Plaintiff:
ROHAN BALL
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
DAVIS v. TECHNOLOGY INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 5:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DAVIS
Defendant:
TECHNOLOGY INSURANCE COMPANY, B & B TRANSPORT INC, JOE DANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
