Cases 71 - 80 of 157,024
Sindaco v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Volusia)
as 3:2024cv00429
Petitioner:
Robert E Sindaco
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cleveland v. Blizzard et al
as 6:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Lamundrick R Cleveland
Defendant:
Attorney Jason T Blizzard, Circuit Judge Kathryn D. Weston and Asst State Attorney Amie M Assent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
STEPHON WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Richard Harris v. Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11357
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HARRIS
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN and W. WOOD
Boone v. Mack
as 1:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
George Boone, Jr.
Respondent:
State Of Alabama and Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Paulk v. Sessler et al
as 3:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
Tiffany J Paulk
Defendant:
FNU Sessler and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alfays Landis v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11303
Petitioner:
ALFAYS LEE LANDIS
Respondent:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Baker v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Seminole County)
as 6:2024cv00808
Petitioner:
Ferdell Baker
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Merritt v. Mathewson et al
as 2:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Larry Bernard Merritt
Defendant:
John Doe Mathewson, John Doe Morales, John Doe Scarpatti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Mountain Progressive Ins.
as 1:2024cv01879
Plaintiff:
Norris Anderson, Jr.
Defendant:
Mountain Progressive Ins.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
