Cases 71 - 80 of 9,423
Alnabulsi v. Mount Pleasant Police Department
as 1:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Alnabulsi and Mohammad Tarek Alnabulsi
Defendant:
Mount Pleasant Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Nichols et al
as 2:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Robert Jay Ward
Defendant:
CO Nichols, CO Marwitz and Lt Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Ostrowski et al
as 2:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Harris
Defendant:
Deputy Jacob Ostrowski, Shawano County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff George Lenzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Milwaukee Circuit Court
as 2:2024cv00295
Petitioner:
Mitchell D Green
Respondent:
Milwaukee Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Alnabulsi v. Racine Public Defender's Office
as 1:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Alnabulsi and Mohammad Tarek Alnabulsi
Defendant:
Racine Public Defender's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alnabulsi v. Racine County Jail
as 1:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Alnabulsi and Mohammad Tarek Alnabulsi
Defendant:
Racine County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodland v. Meisner
as 2:2024cv00482
Petitioner:
Corey Woodland
Respondent:
Warden Michael Meisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Gloudemans et al
as 2:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
William Brown
Defendant:
Captain Gloudemans, B Eversor, Mr Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raney v. Goehl et al
as 2:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Adam Raney
Defendant:
Officer Goehl, Officer Wodak, Ashley Haseleu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Tegels
as 2:2024cv00483
Petitioner:
Roberto I Lopez
Respondent:
Warden Lizzie Tegels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
